Skip to main content
addly

A useful idea starts with a problem that can be reproduced.

The feedback portal prepares a structured request and explains how it moves from observation to a public decision. It turns neither a vote nor a form into a roadmap promise.

Current channel

The template can be copied without collection; the general brief can be sent only after compliant activation. No public voting portal is connected.

Reproducible improvement proposal

addly IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL

1. Work moment
- Host product and placement:
- Affected person or role:
- Current task:

2. Observed problem
- Steps:
- Current result:
- Frequency / impact:
- Workaround:

3. Desired result
- Success indicator:
- Acceptable limits:
- Data or permissions not to add:

4. Decision context
- Relevant addly product:
- Date or event motivating the request:
- May I be contacted to clarify?

From request to delivery trace.

  1. 01ReceiveCapture the problem, role, frequency, and impact.Template
  2. 02QualifyConnect the request to a scenario and expected evidence.Scenarios
  3. 03DecidePublish priority, rejection, or a need for exploration.Roadmap
  4. 04DeliverLink the release note, documentation, and changed limitations.Changelog

What the state means.

Is a submitted request accepted?

No. If collection is enabled and submission confirmed, it becomes an input to qualify, not a delivery commitment.

Does request volume decide priority?

No. Frequency, impact, product fit, risk, maintenance cost, and expected evidence matter together.

How do I know an idea shipped?

Only when a changelog entry links to the updated behavior and documentation.

Where should a vulnerability be reported?

Never in public. A private channel must be configured before launch; Security describes the expected procedure.

Propose the problem. Let the solution earn its place.

Copy the template, then open the brief with ‘Suggest an improvement’. Local copy always works; any compliant submission will never become a roadmap promise.